Latest Headlines on OCRegister.com
[x] Close
Fast Food Maven ~ Restaurant news, trends and culture by Nancy Luna.

Calorie count crackdown begins today

July 1st, 2009, 2:32 am · 32 Comments · posted by Nancy Luna, Staff Writer

epl_brochure

California will launch the first phase of a major crackdown today on restaurant chains, which will be forced to be more pro-active in providing consumers with nutritional data.

The law, which comes in two phases, targets fast-food and sit-down dining chains with 20 or more locations statewide. The first phase, effective July 1, 2009, requires restaurants to offer diners nutritional brochures.

For fast-food chains, the information must be made available at the cash register and at the drive-through.

Cypress-based Baja Fresh is complying with new law by handing out these brochures.

Cypress-based Baja Fresh is complying with new law by handing out these brochures.

The brochures must contain calorie content information for all regular menu items. The pamphlets might also contain grams of saturated fat, grams of carbohydrates and milligrams of sodium, but it is not a requirement — a point of contention for some restaurant chains.

In Orange County, most locally-based chains said they are prepared to follow the law.

Representatives for Costa Mesa-based El Pollo Loco, Irvine-based Taco Bell, Santa Ana-based Wahoo’s Fish Taco, Huntington Beach-based BJ’s Restaurants, Cypress-based Baja Fresh, Irvine-based Mimi’s Cafe, Lake Forest-based Del Taco and San Clemente-based Pick up Stix said special brochures have been made, or updated, to meet requirements.

National chains such as Wendy’s, Rubio’s, Subway, McDonald’s, Jack in the Box, Dairy Queen and Chipotle Mexican Grill said they are also compliant.

Many — such as El Pollo Loco, McDonald’s and Wendy’s — say they have always posted detailed nutritional information in posters at each restaurant and on their websites.

Under the new law, they are taking added steps to promote the availability of  the pamphlets by posting signs at  “drive-through” windows.  One McDonald’s restaurant in Santa Barbara is also experimenting by adding nutritional information at the bottom of your cash-register receipt.

“McDonald’s is committed to providing our customers with comprehensive nutrition information on our menu,” McDonald’s spokeswoman Danya Proud said.

The second part of the so-called California menu labeling law is expected to be much more complicated, and expensive for restaurant owners.

By Jan. 1, 2011, California chains will have to post calorie information on their menus and indoor menu boards.

The law is similar to requirements in New York City, where restaurant owners fought, and lost, a proposal to add calorie counts on menu boards.

“If you truly want to help consumers, you have to give them more information than simply calories,” said Denny Lynch, a spokesman for Wendy’s, the nation’s No. 3 burger chain . “We think (in-store) posters are a better solution.”

Creating new menu boards is costly. Lynch said it cost Wendy’s roughly $800 to $1,000 per store to change each menu board in New York City, where it has about 55 restaurants.

The new boards have also confused some diners.

“When you put the calories up there, the menu gets crowded,” Lynch said. “People are confusing the calories for price.”

“Then, they ask, ‘Why did you raise the price?’”

Tell us: What do you think of the California menu labeling law? Will it change the way people order? Is a brochure with full nutritional information better than a menu board with only calorie information?

Write in and let us know.

Related stories:

Share this post:
  • e-mail
  • Google Bookmarks
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Fark
  • TwitThis
ADVERTISEMENT
Reader Comments
Comments are encouraged, but you must follow our User Agreement.
  1. Keep it civil and stay on topic.
  2. No profanity, vulgarity, racial slurs or personal attacks.
  3. People who harass others or joke about tragedies will be blocked.

 32 Comments

  • yadthink says:

    To require nutritional brochures is fine, but the 1/1/11 requirement for the nutritional data to be included on menus and menuboards is excessive because the costs (cluttered menus and higher restaurant costs) will far exceed the benefits (thinner, healthier diners), IMO. I say just make the nutritional data available on the Web. As an aside, I like that McDonald’s prints the nutritionals on the back of serving tray liners and some food wrappers.

  • drkhlmt says:

    How could somebody possible mistake calories for price? You’d have to be a complete idiot! Hint: calories don’t have a dollar sign in front of them.

    • STACEY says:

      WOW.i just walked through the door and (drkhlmt) you made me laugh early in the day.. thanks

    • IndyMan says:

      HAHAHA! Oh, that’s hilarious! It would take an absolute MORON to confuse price with calories. What a lame excuse! He could have just said, “We don’t have that info, my dog ate it!” OMG!!!! Stupid, stupid, stupid!

  • Howard says:

    drkhlmt: If I had a nickel for every online poster that used the word “idiot,” I’d have enough for one of those burgers that cost 885 dollars.

  • Shannon says:

    It will (and has as of last night) change the way I order. One restaurant had the calorie/carb brochure on the table and my husband and I looked at it for fun- and then to our horror realized how many carbs we were actually consuming! A Gardenburger has 71 carbs vs. an omelette at 7carbs. I will definitely be looking out for the calorie/carb info in the future. I prefer the brochure vs. the menu board for getting info because I need to count carbs, not calories, and as I understand it only calories would be posted on the menu boards.

    • IndyMan says:

      That’s because calories are a unit of energy and the whole “low carb/no carb” fad is fading. Remember the mantra of the 80’s diets? “Calories don’t make us fat, FAT makes us fat!” HA! Then we had “Fat Free” chocolate chip cookies, ice cream, yogurt, muffins, etc, and WE STILL GOT FATTER! Get real. Too many calories will make you fat. It’s that simple. We have over complicated this entire issue and became even fatter because of this. It’s the calories, stupid.

  • John S. says:

    Since it starts today, can you just “IOU” the calories?

  • gc says:

    Just another argument for a part time legislature. Really, these buffons have enough time to pass this into law?

    If you are too stupid understand the potential calories you are shoving down your piehole then you deserve to die of a heart attack.

    Darwin’s theory at work.

  • Jim says:

    Lets see.. for lunch today at Chilis…

    1/2 order texas cheese fries, cup of chicken enchilada, bacon burger, and a chocolate shake.

    Total calories… 3450!

    :)

    • IndyMan says:

      Don’t worry, Jim. According to the “carb counting crowd” you’ll be fine. Because as they tell us, calories won’t make you fat, only the carbs will. So eat with gusto! Order one of those meals everyday, and lose weight! And we wonder how we 60% of Americans retain that World Famous American Pear Shape!

  • Julie Scott says:

    The only good I can possibly see coming from this is that maybe people will finally realize that the “healthy” salads and wraps fast food places added over the last few years are often the worst things for you on the menu.

    But seriously - if you actually care (or even know how many calories you are supposed to be consuming) then you’ve already had access to this information for at least the last 5 years. All this is going to do is drive up the cost of cheap food right when we need cheap food the most. If I only have a $5 budget for lunch, trust me, the last thing I care about is the calories involved.

    Also, if I want a low calorie meal, I’m probably not in the resturant in the first place. It’s not like people are still walking around going “What? You mean I’m putting on weight because I’m eating double cheeseburgers and fries and the equivilent of a six pack of coke for lunch? How strange!”

    • IndyMan says:

      HA! Very true, Julie Scott! If we’re concerned about our weight, STOP EATING AT THESE PLACES! Go rent “Super Size Me!” It’s hilarious and it’ll teach you something. I was shocked to learn how many people DON’T know how many calories they should be consuming each day. And equally amused that each time I asked a “carb counter” just how many carbs are the counting and how many can they have each day and does this include good carbs or only bad carbs, their dumbfounded response was always, “I’m just counting carbs, that’s all.” Huh?

  • Kathin says:

    I have been waiting for this day! It will definitely allow those of us that want to be healthier make better choices. If most people knew what they were really eating they would be appalled!!

    • GaryRobbins says:

      You are a successful woman, or a pathetic attempt at one. You are now fired, goodbye!

      • IndyMan says:

        Mr Robbins, evidenced by your post, I would presume that you are against more information to the public? If after all the restaurants have complied, and after all the naysayers are finally accustomed to REAL info about what they stuff in their pie holes, if after all of this we still have 60% overweight population in America, then it will only show that people don’t care if they’re rotund. Go to your local Costco and have a look. Extra wide shopping carts to load up on extra wide muffins, and then on the way out order an extra large pizza with extra toppings, all for that extra wide World Famous All American Extra Wide Pear Shape! C’mon, people, we got an extra big problem in this country! Stop eating so much and save money, save on health costs, save gas (your car will get better mileage, I swear), and save your marriage. Ask any spouse, do they think this big butt is sexy in a thong? Get real, already!

  • mvmommy says:

    If you will want to get a jaw dropping experience about calories and whatnot - read the “Eat This, Not That” books. You will be blown away.

  • Ric says:

    Jim:
    Sounds good!!!
    Make my shake vanilla.
    I’ll meet you there.

  • ihatefatgurls says:

    Are New Yorkers that dumb ???

  • JohnB says:

    Where this pays off is NOT the typical fast food place where you could find out all the calorie information long ago.

    Where this pays off is sit down places that have carefully avoided publishing any nutrition information on their often INSANELY high calorie entrees. I’m dying to see the numbers for Claim Jumper, although I bet they changed the portion size and recipes in anticipation of this law.

  • Johnb says:

    The next step, warning labels on the burger box!!!

    “WARNING THIS HAMBURGER KNOWN TO CAUSE OBESITY, DIABETES AND HEART ATTACK!”

    CAUTION: Do not eat with fires or apple pie

  • Johnb says:

    JohnB: No one reads the calorie count, they don’t care.

  • Julia Goulia says:

    If you have not figuered out that fast food and restaurant fare is high in calories and fat…I feel sad for you. I am not claiming to be an expert, just carrying on what I witness. I see many overweight people in fast food establishments eating double burgers and fries. And I am traveling this weekend am and sure I will see more.

  • popcorn says:

    The state is going down the tubes. The folks that think it’s a good idea vote for democrats. The same folks are incapable of deducing this as another fee. Priceless.

    • IndyMan says:

      Huh? This is political issue? Are you posting in the right story? Or will you stretch to any length to blame EVERYTHING on Democrats! You listen to Fox News waaaaaay too much! Goodbye, Ditto-head.

  • katie says:

    i ate at TGI Friday’s last week, and they had calorie count listed next to each item. we were shocked at how many calories some of the salads had! obviously, we all know eating at a fast food restaurant is horrible for you, but a sit-down restaurant? not many people think about it.

    i effectively lost my appetite from the calorie counts and ordered soup and salad, which was still high in calories.

  • Brian G says:

    My daughter was diagnosed with “TYPE I” diabetes one year ago this week. Since then we have had a difficult time quantifying the carbs associated with each meal when we dine out. It is important to know what the carbs are so she can add the proper amount of insulin. We do not have a problem finding calorie counts for the meals she eats on the restaurant websites but we rarely find carb counts. Is it important to me to have this information available? Yes.

  • art M says:

    I think coffee shops that serve food, such as Starbucks and Peets, should be required to post calories. I know Starbucks currently does, but Peets does not.

  • Ben says:

    MediaCurves.com conducted a study on 402 viewers of a news clip featuring restaurants that provide nutritional information to their customers. Results found that the majority of respondents (84%) reported that restaurants should be required to list nutritional information. The study revealed that 60% of respondents indicated that requiring all restaurants to list nutritional information would help to decrease the national obesity rate.
    More in depth results can be seen at:
    http://www.mediacurves.com/HealthCare/J7577-CalorieCounting/Index.cfm
    Thanks,
    Ben

    • IndyMan says:

      This is good news, and also expected news; sane people who want more information that pertains to their daily lives. Despite all the naysayers who post from a knee-jerk perspective, MOST Americans want this information readily available. A little sanity goes a long way.

  • IndyMan says:

    Oh my! Some of these comments are just genius; hilarious!

    “What? You mean I’m putting on weight because I’m eating double cheeseburgers and fries and the equivilent of a six pack of coke for lunch? How strange!” Yeah, but it’s low in carbs! Ha!

    “How could somebody possible mistake calories for price? You’d have to be a complete idiot! Hint: calories don’t have a dollar sign in front of them.”

    “If I had a nickel for every online poster that used the word “idiot,” I’d have enough for one of those burgers that cost 885 dollars.” This one made me laugh for a good ten minutes, non stop!

    But as stated by another, if people are serous about either losing weight or keeping from getting fat, they wouldn’t frequent these places. I used the word “frequent,” meaning more that one or two times a month.

    Did anyone ever see Super Size Me?

Leave a Reply