Latest Headlines on OCRegister.com
[x] Close
Fast Food Maven ~ Restaurant news, trends and culture by Nancy Luna.

Brown-bag lunches stealing business from fast-food

July 28th, 2008, 3:00 am · 7 Comments · posted by Kristine Lu

More consumers are brown bagging, according to new studyMore consumers are turning to brown-bagging to save money, according to a new study by market research company NPD.

The New York consulting firm said more consumers are “brown-bagging” because it’s more valuable, healthy, convenient, tasty and simply better alternative to buying lunches every day at local restaurants.

According to the NPD’s study “How Brown-Bagging Is Affecting Foodservice Lunch,” weekday lunches brought from home reached a new high last year, increasing from 35 bagged lunches per capita in 2006 to 38 in 2007. Though brown-bag lunches have generally increased over the last few years, studies show that adult males are still most frequently bringing their lunches, as are white-collar professionals with mid- to high-incomes. The most frequent brown-baggers pack their lunch an average of three times per week.

The news is another blow to the restaurant industry, which is suffering due to a downturn in sales.

Nearly half of the consumers who usually visit restaurants for lunch said they were visiting less often, the NPD study shows. As a result, restaurants are reporting declines in sales due to less people buying lunches to bring back to the workplace.

Fast-food chains, whose lunch-time sales often represent 80 percent of their total revenue, are especially vulnerable to this new brown-bagging trend, NPD said.

So, what factors are forcing more and more Americans to find alternative ways to eat lunch these days?

NPD Vice President Harry Balzer cites many reasons for the newfound popularity in brown-bagging.

“Certainly the economy, growing unemployment, the erosion of disposable personal income, slow-down in number of women entering the workforce and more telecommuting options are also influencing consumers’ lunchtime behaviors,” he said.

Consumers cite financial concerns as their top reason for brown-bagging, followed closely by health and nutrition, convenience, taste, diet, quality and environmental concerns.

“Consumers are definitely in a cost-cutting mode,” says Balzer. “And, make no mistake about it, making lunch at home and carrying it to work saves money. In addition, consumers can control what and how much of it is in the bag.”

Tell us:

Are you brown bagging at lunch more often?
View Results

Related stories:

Share this post:
  • e-mail
  • Google
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Fark
  • TwitThis
Posted in: Fast food news
 
ADVERTISEMENT

 7 Comments

  • Ron says:

    “Brown-bag lunches stealing business from fast-food” ??
    I guess I’m stealing from the local Jaguar dealer if I don’t stop in and buy myself a car today.

  • Ronald says:

    California restaurants sided with the thieving politicians and went along with their prohibiting them from serving the many millions of decent women and men who smoke tobacco. *(for purposes of taxation and control only)

    In response, they cut portion size, substituted Soup AND salad with Soup OR Salad and raised prices they charged the non smokers who eat food. Now, they complain that the non smokers are no longer willing to be taken advantage of.

    What’s wrong with this picture?

    Ronald

  • Christina says:

    Hey, until the restaurants can offer a meal that’s healthier and under $4-$5, why not pack your own? The restaurants aren’t going to help you out when you’ve run out of money because you ate out all the time.

  • CK says:

    Ronald - I would rather pay a slightly higher price at a restaurant than deal with smokers. If restaurants ever opened back up to smokers inside, you would not see me eating there anymore.

  • inka says:

    I’m with you, CK. I don’t want to smell smoke when I’m eating out. I won’t visit a place where smoking is allowed. But we are talking about “fast food” here and much of their food is made “to-go”, so I don’t think smoking is that much of an issue in the first place.

    I don’t know if this one food study is correct, but you should see the big mall-type stores around here. Ghost towns - even on week-ends. They’re predicting a dismal Christmas 2008 already. There’s little doubt that people are cutting back.

  • joe says:

    “…prohibiting them from serving the many millions of decent women and men who smoke tobacco”

    Um, they did no such thing. These “decent women and men” can still be served. They just can’t smoke inside while they’re there.

    Seems to me that the millions MORE (78% of the population) that doesn’t want to slowly kill themselves deserve to be able to eat a meal without smoke in their faces.

    Enough with the whining.

Leave a Reply